Would the anchor be more intense if only one packet was used? To infuse all the feelings into just one packet? To use multiple finger taps on the packet during the height of the state she was eliciting? What about tapping on his side of the table, after the anchor had been set and moved closer to him? A body language book I read said his territory begins slightly after the middle of the table, anything past midway on her side was in her territory or realm of reality. Anything on his side was in his territory or realm of reality. If all movements took place on his side would his reality be where you want to anchor? Of course shortening the playing field and intensifying the effect may caused him to "need a napkin",but isn't
1 Comments:
At April 7, 2008 9:41 AM ,
Anonymous said...
Would the anchor be more intense if only one packet was used? To infuse all the feelings into just one packet? To use multiple finger taps on the packet during the height of the state she was eliciting? What about tapping on his side of the table, after the anchor had been set and moved closer to him? A body language book I read said his territory begins slightly after the middle of the table, anything past midway on her side was in her territory or realm of reality. Anything on his side was in his territory or realm of reality. If all movements took place on his side would his reality be where you want to anchor? Of course shortening the playing field and intensifying the effect may caused him to "need a napkin",but isn't
>that kind of compelling intensity<
what its all about?
inspectoragri@yahoo.com
Post a Comment
<< Home